會員的分享

因為喜歡做問卷而加入這網站，原本只是希望能累積點數換東西，沒想到竟然抽到了大獎，實在是太幸運了，完全不敢相信。感謝！我一定會繼續做問卷的！

---

如何成為會員？

加入會員非常簡單，只要到註冊網頁上填寫您的詳細資料即可，我們會傳送申請表連結給您，讓您確認自己的會員資格，如果您未滿十四歲，需請家長或監護人代您申請並成為會員，然後透過他們參與調查。

2017-04-2603:00

貢寮 交友COMIC RELIEF AmoGood’s parodic movie reviews are often offbeat and irreverent critiques. However, two firms see nothing funny about them, claiming they lost revenue/ Staff writer, with CNAAmoGood （谷阿莫）, a Taiwanese YouTuber known for his irreverent movie reviews, has found himself in a legal battle after being sued for copyright infringement.Video streaming platform KKTV Co and film company Autoai Design on Monday said that they are suing AmoGood for infringing on their intellectual property rights by using images from their films without notifying them in advance.KKTV executive Yang Chih-kuang （楊志光） yesterday accused AmoGood of reproducing and spreading unauthorized content and for failing to give attribution when using images from the South Korean TV series W, which it distributed in Taiwan.AmoGood has knowingly spread unauthorized content on YouTube, Facebook, Weibo and other online platforms, Yang said.Yang declined to comment on the amount of damages sought, saying that the case has entered judicial proceedings.Autoai Design said AmoGood has used images from at least four films that it has distributed and has affected the films box office recei士林約會餐廳pts by making them “sound boring.”AmoGood, whose YouTube channel has more than 987,000 subscribers, produces short柬埔寨 佛教 videos using scenes from films while he sums up the plot, often in an offbeat and irreverent manner.AmoGood on Monday defended his videos online, saying that he believes they do not violate the principle of fair use under copyright law, which allows people to use copyrighted materials for commentary, research, news reporting and other purposes without having to obtain permission from the copyrig免費交友ht holder.The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office yesterday said that it has started an investigation and that police searched AmoGood’s company on Wednesday.Chang Chung-hsin （章忠信）, a academic who specializes in intellectual property law, said that if AmoGood’s short videos雙溪 約會 are intended to mock and ridicule the original film, then he has a better chance of arguing that his videos are in line with Article 52 of the Copyright Act （著作權法）, which stipulates that, within a reasonable scope, works can be quoted where necessary for comment or other legitimate purposes.“However, if the videos are merely short film synopses, it will be harder for the YouTuber to claim fair use,” Chang said.新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES

• http://news93bb.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-1090.html
• http://news13dt.pixnet.net/blog/post/399771061
• http://mypaper.pchome.com.tw/dlv77vj37x/post/1363211813

柬埔寨金邊, 柬埔寨旅遊, 金邊旅遊

3140FD15CB073536